Implement proper tiers for final-energy variables #215
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Unless there are any objections to this PR implementing proper tiers for final-energy variables, I will merge it by end of this week. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Per a nudge by @gunnar-pik, this PR uses a new nomenclature-feature to assign different tiers from tag-lists.
The tier is defined in the variable - if a tag-list is used for that variable, the tag-item can increment the variable-tier using
^1or^2. This way, final-energy variables at a "high" aggregate, e.g Final Energy|Agriculture|Electricity keep the tier-1 assignment, but "higher-resolution" variables like Final Energy|Non-Energy Use|Non-Ferrous Metals|Liquids|Electricity have a higher tier-value.See the attached file for a simple view of the resulting tier-assignment.
final-energy-with-tier.xlsx
closes #212